Press Release 13.11.11Draft Press Release 13.11.11
Drifting into two kinds of debt and more.
Dr Peter Cleave, Mana, Rangitikei said today that there were two major kinds of debt for constituents in the Rangitikei electorate to beware of. The first of these is the ETS. Unsuspecting taxpayers will foot the bill while corporates slide out of their commitments. At this stage we will overshoot our commitment to Kyoto. Who will pay?
Dr Cleave set out the broad strokes of the present ETS position for Aotearoa-New Zealand;
• NZ is expected to overshoot its Kyoto target by 18%
• The ETS pays for less than 20% of the resulting liability
• The Government is borrowing forest credits to cover the gap and when this is properly accounted for, NZ is today 49 megatonnes in deficit – a multibillion dollar liability, the scale of which depends on future carbon prices.
‘As if this is not bad enough there is a catch,’ said Dr Cleave. He then set out the way this forty nine megatonne deficit could drift into escalating debt depending on carbon prices. This total position of a 49 megatonne deficit is worth:
• $1 billion at the $20.33/tonne carbon price used in the Budget;
• $2.45 billion at the $50/tonne figure the government uses for modeling after 2012 (when the credits seem much more likely to be purchased); and
• $5 billion if carbon prices rise to $100/tonne.
‘We cannot afford to sit with our heads in the sand denying the science of global warming and calling the ETS ‘a big con’ as Ian McKelvie is doing,’ said Dr Cleave. ‘And just as the Occupy protesters are telling us about the way financial markets have been corrupted we need to be wary of the same thing happening with the carbon market. It would be tragic if corporates manipulated this so that poor and working folk bore the burden of ETS overshoots.’
The second kind of debt is illustrated in a recent letter to the Manawatu Standard by Peter Wheeler (12.11.11). This involves Manfeild;
‘Manawatu District Mayor and National candidate for Rangitikei does it again, firstly he bails out the Manfeild Park Trust using rate payers money by buying back land gifted to the trust. Beat that for stupidity. Then he plans to sell off large chunks of district council land to the PNCC to get his council out of hock. And now he thinks that the National Parties policy on the Emissions Trading Scheme is a load of rubbish. What next, a subsidy to dairy farmers to continue polluting our rivers and land. He is already being subsidised for doing just that [polluting our rivers].
Even after this erratic and irrational behaviour the Manawatu Standard’s Grant Miller attempts to paint McKelvie as some sort of hero. We all know the National Party could nominate any farm animal as its candidate for Rangitikei and still win the seat but these days I'm sure even dairy farmers are looking for forward
looking leaders who accept that climate change is a fact and that farming or continuing to pollute our rivers needs serious consideration.
Finally and using the now infamous words of his [McKelvie's] party leader Key,
"Just show us the money" Ian. You couldn't do it for Manfeild; you couldn't do it for your council, so we must presume that you can't do it for the ETS.’
‘I support what Peter Wheeler is saying in his letter,’ said Dr Cleave. ‘We cannot afford to drift into debt this way.’
‘There is more,’ said Dr Cleave ‘There is a culture of aimless drift in the Manawatu at the municipal and the parliamentary representative levels. A major case has drifted in and out of court recently between Horizons and the Palmerston North City Council with one accusing the other of non- compliance regarding pollution. Aside from lawyers’ fees there is mention of a $600,000 fine. I have called for the Auditor General to look at this wastage of ratepayers and taxpayers money,’ said Dr Cleave. ’These things should not be getting to court, there should be proper systems whereby one council monitors another without wasting money on lawyers and fines.’
Dr Cleave noted that many locals are upset.
‘The unconscious drifting into debt of Ian McKelvie has been well described albeit in an unflattering way by Peter Wheeler in his letter above,’ said Dr Cleave. ‘What happened at Manfeild seems to have been more of the same; a strange kind of lofty denial that there is a debt and then an ongoing drift into further debt. Put that together with the drift and stagnation that we have with the Manawatu River and its pollution and I say the people of the Rangitikei deserve a lot better.’
One final thing; Dr Cleave said,'Peter Wheeler makes a good critique of the local Fairfax media who have set a standard in reporting minutiae and leaving out the main story that would set John Cleese off on one of his silly walks. As council and court proceedings are covered point by dreary point the progressive pollution of the Manawatu river by cities, towns, farmers and others has gone on noticed by some and almost willfully ignored by others. Who has been part of the problem and who has been part of the solution?'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I have shamelessly precised and adapted Ken Ring’s analysis of Kyoto.
http://WWW.investigatemagazine.com/mt/mt-tb.pl/298
The US congressional record V. 150, Pt. 11, June 25, 2004 to July 14, 2004
supports his contentions.
Aotearoa should never have signed up for Kyoto. The Labour government was forced to do so because they needed the Greens for support in Confidence and Supply. Positive credit-trading with all our trees acting as CO2 sinks made politicians see dollar signs. The Kyoto Protocol is set to ruin economies and any players, like Aotearoa, foolish enough to be taken in. (Many of the signatories to the protocol are now pulling out of it).
Few people realise that Kyoto was the brainchild of a corrupt multinational energy company, Enron. The 1990 US Clean Air Act amendments authorized its Environmental Protection Agency to put a cap on how much pollutant the operator of a fossil-fueled plant was allowed to emit.
Enron helped establish the market for, and became the major trader in the EPA’s sulphur dioxide cap-and-trade program - the forerunner of today’s carbon credit trade. This commodity exchange of emission allowances caused Enron’s stock to rapidly rise.
In 1993 Al Gore led a US initiative to review new projects around the world and issue ‘credits’ of so many tons of annual CO2 emission reduction. Under law a tradable system was required, which was what Enron also wanted because they were already trading pollutant credits.
Enron vigorously lobbied Clinton and Congress, for EPA regulatory authority over CO2. From 1994-96 the Enron Foundation contributed nearly $1 million dollars to the Nature Conservancy, whose Climate Change Project promotes global warming theories. Enron provided almost $1.5 million to environmental groups that support international energy controls to “reduce” global warming. Enron stood to profit millions from global warming energy-trading schemes.
A letter to President Clinton dated 1/9/98 signed by Ken Lay et al asked the president to shut off the public scientific debate on global warming. One of Enron’s major consultants was NASA scientist James Hansen, who started the global warming debate. Enron’s own internal study of global warming science turned out to be largely in agreement with the same scientists that they were trying to shut up. Henson subsequently published a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences predicting exactly the same inconsequential amount of warming in the next 50 years as the scientists that Enron wanted to gag!
Enron was the owner and operator of an interstate network of natural gas pipelines. Enron stood to profit millions from global warming energy-trading schemes. Coal-burning utilities would have had to pay billions for permits because they emit more CO2 than do natural gas facilities. Closing coal plants in favor of natural gas or other kinds of power plants, would have driven up prices for those alternatives. Enron, along with others in the so-called Clean Power Group – would make money both coming and going – from selling permits and then their own energy at higher prices.
If the Kyoto Protocol were ratified and in full force, experts estimate that Americans would lose between $100-$400 billion each year; between 1 - 3.5 million jobs could be lost, and each household would lose an average of up to $6,000 each year – while large energy companies pocketed millions from a regulatory scheme. The Kyoto Protocol is set to ruin economies and bring down any players foolish enough to be taken in.
Enron collapsed through bribery, misinformation, energy price manipulation and the use of political connections to exert pressure on energy boards. Ken Lay was indicted by a federal grand jury for his involvement in the Kyoto scandal.
Post a Comment